ARTICLE
Tuning of the equilibrated residual method for applications in general, direct and inverse piezoelectricity
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Institute of Fluid Flow Machinery, Polish Academy of Sciences, Gdansk, Poland
 
2
University of Warmia and Mazury, Faculty of Technical Sciences, Olsztyn, Poland
 
 
Submission date: 2023-10-29
 
 
Acceptance date: 2023-12-11
 
 
Online publication date: 2024-03-10
 
 
Publication date: 2024-04-30
 
 
Corresponding author
Grzegorz Zboiński   

Department of Mechanics of Intelligent Structures, Polish Academy of Sciences, Institute of Fluid Flow Machinery, Fiszera 14, 80-231, Gdańsk, Poland
 
 
Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics 2024;62(2):219-230
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
This paper presents application and tuning of the equilibrated residual method (ERM) of a posteriori error estimation for coupled electromechanical problems of direct, inverse and general piezoelectricity. In these three cases, either electric potential is induced by strains or strains appear due to the applied electric potential or both phenomena occur simultaneously. The mentioned ERM is assigned for the assessment of modeling and approximation errors of the numerical finite element solution. Such error values usually serve as indication for adaptive hierarchical modeling and adaptive mesh changes within thin and/or solid piezoelectric members so as to obtain the solution of assumed accuracy.
 
REFERENCES (22)
1.
Ainsworth M., 2005, A synthesis of a posteriori error estimation techniques for conforming, nonconforming and discontinuous Galerkin finite element methods. [In:] Recent Advances in Adaptive Computation. Contemporary Mathematics, Vol. 383, Z.-C. Shi et al. (Edit.), AMS, Providence, 1-14.
 
2.
Ainsworth M., Babuska I., 1999, Reliable and robust a posteriori error estimation for singularly perturbed reaction-diffusion problems, SIAM Journal of Numerical Analysis, 36, 331-353.
 
3.
Ainsworth M., Demkowicz L., Kim C.W., 2007, Analysis of the equilibrated residual method for a posteriori error estimation on meshes with hanging nodes, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 196, 3493-3507.
 
4.
Ainsworth M., Oden J.T., 1992, A procedure for a posteriori error estimation for h-p finite element methods, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 101, 73-96.
 
5.
Ainsworth M., Oden J.T., 1993a, A posteriori error estimators for second order elliptic systems: Part 1. Theoretical foundations and a posteriori error analysis, Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 25, 101-113.
 
6.
Ainsworth M., Oden J.T., 1993b, A posteriori error estimators for second order elliptic systems: Part 2. An optimal order process for calculating self-equilibrating fluxes, Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 26, 75-87.
 
7.
Ainsworth M., Oden J.T., 1993c, A unified approach to a posteriori error estimation using element residual methods, Numerische Mathematik, 65, 23-50.
 
8.
Ainsworth M., Oden J.T., Wu W., 1994, A posteriori error estimation for h-p approximation in elastostatics, Applied Numerical Mathematics, 14, 23-55.
 
9.
Bank R.E., Weiser A., 1985, Some a posteriori error estimators for elliptic partial differential equations, Mathematics of Computation, 44, 283-301.
 
10.
Cimatti G., 2004, The piezoelectric continuum, Annali di Matematica Pura ed Applicata, 183, 495-514.
 
11.
Demkowicz L., 2007, Computing with hp-Adaptive Finite Elements. Vol. 1. One- and Two-Dimensional Elliptic and Maxwell Problems, Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL.
 
12.
Ieşan D., 1990, Reciprocity, uniqueness and minimum principles in the linear theory of piezoelectricity, International Journal of Engineering Science, 28, 1139-1149.
 
13.
Kelly D.W., 1984, The self-equilibration of residuals and complementary a posteriori error estimates in the finite element method, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 20, 1491-1506.
 
14.
Ladeveze P., Leguillon L., 1983, Error estimate procedure in the finite element method and applications, SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 20, 485-509.
 
15.
Oden J.T., Cho J.R., 1996, Adaptive hpq-finite element methods of hierarchical models for plate- and shell-like structures, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 136, 317-345.
 
16.
Preumont A., 2006, Mechatronics. Dynamics of Electromechanical and Piezoelectric Systems, Springer, Dordrecht.
 
17.
Zboiński G., 2010, Adaptive hpq finite element methods for the analysis of 3D-based models of complex structures. Part 1. Hierarchical modeling and approximation, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 199, 2913-2940.
 
18.
Zboiński G, 2013, Adaptive hpq finite element methods for the analysis of 3D-based models of complex structures. Part 2. A posteriori error estimation, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 267, 531-565.
 
19.
Zboiński G., 2016, Problems of hierarchical modeling and hp-adaptive finite element analysis in elasticity, dielectricity and piezoelectricity, [In:] Perusal of the Finite Element Method. R. Petrova (Ed.), InTech, Rijeka (Croatia), 1-29.
 
20.
Zboiński G., 1018, Adaptive modeling and simulation of elastic, dielectric and piezoelectric problems, [In:] Finite Element Method. Simulation, Numerical Analysis and Solution Techniques, R. Păcurar (Ed.), InTech, Rijeka (Croatia), 157-192.
 
21.
Zboiński G., 2019, 3D-based hierarchical models and hpq-approximations for adaptive finite element method of Laplace problems as exemplified by linear dielectricity, Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 78, 2468-2511.
 
22.
Zboiński G., 2020, Tuning of the equilibrated residual method for applications in elasticity, dielectricity and piezoelectricity, [In:] AIP Conference Proceedings, 2239, W. Cecot et al., (Edit.), AIP Publishing, 020050-1-18.
 
eISSN:2543-6309
ISSN:1429-2955
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top