ARTICLE
Computational prediction of the resistance of the the floatplane at various trim angles
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Naval Architecture, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya, Indonesia
 
2
Balai Teknologi Hidrodinamika-BPPT Indonesia
 
 
Submission date: 2021-08-08
 
 
Final revision date: 2022-02-21
 
 
Acceptance date: 2022-03-14
 
 
Online publication date: 2022-04-07
 
 
Publication date: 2022-04-30
 
 
Corresponding author
Aries Sulisetyono   

Department of Naval Architecture, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Kampus ITS Sukolilo, 60111, Surabaya, Indonesia
 
 
Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics 2022;60(2):267-278
 
TOPICS
 
REFERENCES (19)
1.
Aliffrananda M.H., Sulisetyono A., 2021, Porpoising instability study of the floatplane during take-off operation on calm water, IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering, 1052, 1, 012013.
 
2.
Aliffrananda M.H., Sulisetyono A., Hermawan Y.A., Zubaydi A., 2022, Numerical analysis of floatplane porpoising instability at calm water during take-off, International Journal Technology, 13, 1, 190-201.
 
3.
Berg T., 2015, Simulating sinkage & trim for planing boat hulls, FLUENT Workshop.
 
4.
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA-H-8083-23), 2004, Seaplane, Skiplane, and Float/Ski Equipped Helicopter Operations Handbook, Aviation Supplies & Academics Inc.
 
5.
Gudmundsson S., 2014, General Aviation Aircraft Design, Oxford: Elsevier.
 
6.
Insel M., Molland A.F., 1992, An investigation into the resistance components of high-speed displacement catamarans, Transactions of the RINA, 134, 1-20.
 
7.
ITTC, 2011, Practical guidelines for ship CFD applications, 26th International Towing Tank Conference Specialist Committee on CFD in Marine Hydrodynamics.
 
8.
Locke F.W.S., 1944, General Resistance Tests on Flying-Boat Hull Models, National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, Wartime Report, NACA, Washington.
 
9.
Molland A.F., Turnock S.R., Hudson D.A., 2017, Ship Resistance and Propulsion, Cambridge University Press.
 
10.
Qiu L., Song W., 2013, Efficient decoupled hydrodynamic and aerodynamic analysis of amphibious aircraft water takeoff process, Journal of Aircraft, 50, 5, 1369-1379.
 
11.
Reichel M., Minchev A., Larsen N.L., 2014, Trim optimization – theory and practice, International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, 8, 3, 387-392.
 
12.
Sajedi S.M., Ghadimi P., 2020, Experimental and numerical investigation of stepped planing hulls in finding an optimized step location and analysis of its porpoising phenomenon, Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2020.
 
13.
Sazak E., 2017, Parametric Investigation of Hull Shaped Fuselage for Amphibious UAV, Middle East Technical University.
 
14.
Savitsky D., 1964, Hydrodynamic design of planing hulls, Marine Technology, 1, 4, 71-95.
 
15.
Sherbaz S., Duan W., 2014, Ship trim optimization: assessment of influence of trim on resistance of MOERI container ship, The Scientific World Journal, 2014.
 
16.
Suydam H.B., 1952, Hydrodynamic Characteristics of a Low-Drag, Planing-Tail Flying-Boat Hull, National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, Washington.
 
17.
Tomaszewski K.M., 1950, Hydrodynamic Design of Seaplane Floats, Aeronautical Research Council, Ministry of Supply, London.
 
18.
Versteeg H., Malalasekera W., 2007, An Introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics the Finite Volume Method, Pearson Education Limited.
 
19.
Yanuar, Gunawan, Utomo A.S.A., Luthfi M.N., Baezal M.A.B., Majid F.R.S., Chairunisa Z., 2020, Numerical and experimental analysis of total hull resistance on floating catamaran pontoon for N219 seaplanes based on biomimetics design with clearance configuration, International Journal of Technology, 11, 7, 1397-1405.
 
eISSN:2543-6309
ISSN:1429-2955
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top