ARTICLE
A tool orientation smoothing method for five-axis machining to avoid singularity problems
Chuanhui Cui 1,2,3
,
 
,
 
,
 
,
 
,
 
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
School of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Beihang University, Beijing, China
 
2
Collaborative Innovation Center for Advanced Aero-Engine, Beihang University, Beijing, China
 
3
Dongchang College of Liaocheng University, Liaocheng
 
4
AECC South Industry Company Limited, ZhuZhou, China
 
 
Submission date: 2022-05-29
 
 
Final revision date: 2022-10-16
 
 
Acceptance date: 2022-10-17
 
 
Online publication date: 2023-01-03
 
 
Publication date: 2023-01-30
 
 
Corresponding author
Chuanhui Cui   

Collaborative Innovation Center for Advanced Aero-Engine, Beihang University, China
 
 
Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics 2023;61(1):89-102
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
In numerically controlled grinding of aeroengine blades, a sharp change in a rotating shaft caused by a singular zone greatly reduces grinding precision and quality. This paper proposes an algorithm to optimize the tool-path that combines optimization of the C-axis rotation angle, a modification to the tool orientation and adjustments to the tool position by taking a four-array machine tool with two rotational axes (B-axis and C-axis) as an example. The algorithm was verified using VERICUT software, furthermore, in machining experiments, the rotation amplitudes of the rotary axis in singular areas was effectively reduced, which ensured grinding quality of blades.
REFERENCES (24)
1.
Affouard A., Duc E., Lartigue C., Langeron J.M., Bourdet P., 2004, Avoiding 5-axis singularities using tool-path deformation, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 44, 4, 415-425.
 
2.
Anotaipaiboon W., Makhanov S.S., Bohez E.L.J., 2006, Optimal setup for five-axis machining, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 46, 9, 964-977.
 
3.
Castagnetti C., Duc E., Ray P., 2008, The domain of admissible orientation concept: A new method for five-axis tool-path optimization, Computer-Aided Design, 40, 9, 938-950.
 
4.
Chen G.L., Zhao C.R., 2015, Digital production line of precision forging aeroengine blade (in Chinese), Aeronautical Manufacturing Technology, 22, 78-83.
 
5.
Chen L.J., Wei G.X., Sui Y.Z., Wang Z.Z., 2020, Non-linear error control method for five-axis machining singular zone, Modular Machine Tool and Automatic Manufacturing Technique, 3, 111-113, 118.
 
6.
Cripps R.J., Cross B., Hunt M., Mullineux G., 2017, Singularities in five-axis machining: Cause, effect and avoidance, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 116, 40-51.
 
7.
Geng C., Wu Y., Qiu J., 2018, Analysis of nonlinear error caused by motions of rotation axes for five-axis machine tools with orthogonal configuration, Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2018, 8, 1-16.
 
8.
Huang Y., Xiao G.J., Zou L., 2016, Current situation and development trend of grinding technology for blisk (in Chinese), Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 37, 2045-2064.
 
9.
Lartigue C., Tournier C., Ritou M., Dumur D., 2004, High-performance NC for HSM by means of polynomial trajectories, CIRP Annals, 53, 1, 317-320.
 
10.
Lin Z.W., Fu J.Z., Shen H.Y., Gan W.F., 2014, Non-singular tool-path planning by translating tool orientations in C-space, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 71, 9-12, 1835-1848.
 
11.
Lin Z.W., Fu J.Z., Shen H.Y., Xu G.H., Sun Y.F., 2016, Improving machined surface texture in avoiding five-axis singularity with the acceptable-texture orientation region concept, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 108, 1-12.
 
12.
Lu Y.A., Bi Q.Z., Zhu L.M., 2016, Five-axis flank milling tool-path generation with smooth rotary motions, Procedia CIRP, 56, 161-166.
 
13.
Ma L., Wang H.X., Zhang Y., 2015, Grinding parameters optimization for leading and trailing edge of aero-engine blade (in Chinese), Modular Machine Tool and Automatic Manufacturing Technique, 22, 78-83.
 
14.
Munlin M., Makhanov S.S., Bohez E.L.J., 2004, Optimization of rotations of a five-axis milling machine near stationary points, Computer-Aided Design, 36, 12, 1117-1128.
 
15.
Pal M., 2005, Random forest classifier for remote sensing classification, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 26, 1, 217-222.
 
16.
Riesenfeld R.F., 1975, Nonuniform B-Spline Curves, 2nd ed. USA-JAPAN Conference Proceedings, 551-555.
 
17.
Sørby K., 2007, Inverse kinematics of five-axis machines near singular configurations, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 47, 2, 299-306.
 
18.
Tajima S., Sencer B., 2020, Real-time trajectory generation for 5-axis machine tools with singularity avoidance, CIRP Annals, 69, 1, 349-352.
 
19.
Wan M., Liu Y., Xing W.J., Zhang W.H., 2018, Singularity avoidance for five-axis machine tools through introducing geometrical constraints, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 127, 1-13.
 
20.
Wang D., Chen Z.T., Chen W.Y., 2008, Detection and control of non-1inear errors in 5-axis machining (in Chinese), J. Beijing Univ. Aeronaut. Astronaut., 34, 9, 1003-1006, 1091.
 
21.
Wang L.N., 2012, Study on singular point problem in 5-axis NC machining (in Chinese), Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, 5, 122-124, 129.
 
22.
Wang R.Q., 2007, Theoretical Research on Wide-Stripe NC Machining and its Application in Blade Machining (in Chinese), Beijing: Beihang University, 156-189.
 
23.
Xu R., Chen Z., 2014, Method of five-axis tool radius compensation based on post-processor, Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 50, 13, 157-164.
 
24.
Yang J.X., Altintas Y., 2013, Generalized kinematics of five-axis serial machines with non-singular tool path generation, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 75, 119-132.
 
eISSN:2543-6309
ISSN:1429-2955
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top