Since 1963
ARTICLE
Seismic ground response analyses at an international airport in northern Italy by using a stochastic-based
| 1 | European Centre for Training and Research in Earthquake Engineering, Eucentre, Pavia, Italy |
| 2 | Italian Civil Aviation Authority, Rome, Italy |
| 3 | Italian Department of Civil Protection, Rome, Italy |
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Submission date: 2019-11-30
Final revision date: 2020-01-15
Acceptance date: 2020-02-25
Online publication date: 2020-04-15
Publication date: 2020-04-15
Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics 2020;58(2):499–511
KEYWORDS
airportground responseseismic microzonationstochastic mechanicsGIS (Geo-graphical Information System)
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Airports play a crucial role in mitigation of seismic-induced disasters, being key elements
in rescue operations after an earthquake. Under earthquake loading, various airport compo-
nents can be damaged because of the ground shaking. It is well known that seismic ampli-
fication of ground motion at the surface is strongly influenced by geotechnical properties of
the soil deposits. In this paper, the spatial variability of ground amplification is assessed with
reference to an international airport in Northern Italy. Homogeneous zones from a seismic
geotechnical viewpoint were identified at the airport and, for each zone, stochastic ground
response analyses carried out.
REFERENCES (35)
1.
Andreotti G., Famà A., Lai, C.G., 2018, Hazard-dependent soil factors for site-specific elastic acceleration response spectra of Italian and European seismic building codes, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 16, 5769-5800, DOI: 10.1007/s10518-018-0422-9.
2.
Assimaki D., Pecker A., Popescu R., Prevost J., 2003, Effects of spatial variability of soil properties on surface ground motion, Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 7, SI1, 1-44.
3.
Awojobi A.O., 1975, The settlement of a foundation on Gibson soil of the second kind, Géotechnique, 25, 2, 221-228, DOI: 10.1680/geot.1975.25.2.221.
4.
Boore D., 2004, Can site response be predicted? Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 8, SI1, 141.
5.
Bozzoni F., Lai C.G., Scandella L., 2012, 2012 Emilia earthquakes: preliminary results of ground-motion characteristics, Annals of Geophysics, 55, 4, 609-614, DOI: 10.4401/ag-6121.
6.
Bozzoni F., Scandella L., Lai C.G., Corigliano M., 2011, Assessment of the seismic damage of maritime ports by using GIS technology: the case study of the port of Salerno (in Italian), Progettazione Sismica, 1, 1, 117-137.
7.
Circ. NTC, 2019, Instructions to apply the Italian Building Code 2018 (in Italian), C.S.LL.PP, G.U. n.35 11/02/2019.
8.
Corigliano M., Lai C.G., Rota M., Strobbia C., 2012, ASCONA: Automated selection of compatible natural accelerograms, Earthake Spectra, 28, 3, 965-987, DOI: 10.1193/1.4000072.
9.
Darendeli M.B., 2001, Development of a new family of normalized modulus reduction and material damping curves, Ph.D. thesis, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
10.
DPR, 2015, Identification of airports of national interest (in Italian), Decreto del Presidente della Repubblica, G.U. n. 294 18/12/2015.
11.
EN 1998-1, 2004, Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance – Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings.
12.
Eurocode 8, 2003, Design of structures for earthquake resistance, Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings, Pr-EN1998-1, European Committee for Standardization (CEN), Brussels.
13.
Faccioli E., 1991, Seismic amplification in the presence of geological and topographic irregularities, Proceedings International Conference on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, St. Louis, Missouri, 1779-1797.
14.
Gibson R.E., 1967, Some results concerning displacements and stresses in a non-homogeneous elastic half-space, Géotechnique, 17, 1, 58-67, DOI: 10.1680/geot.1967.17.1.58.
15.
Idriss I.M., 1990, Response of soft soil sites during earthquakes, Proceedings of H. Bolton Seed Memorial Symposium, J.M. Duncan (Edit.), 2, 273-290.
16.
ISSMGE, 1999, Manual for Zonation of Seismic Geotechnical Hazards – Technical Committee for Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering TC4, The Japanese Geotechnical Society, Tokyo, Japan.
17.
Kramer S.L., 1996, Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering, Prentice-Hall International Series in Civil Engineering and Engineering Mechanics, 653.
18.
Lai C.G., Corigliano M., Snchez H.L., 2009. Some examples of 1D, fully stochastic site response analyses of soil deposits, Proceedings of the ACES Workshop: Advances in Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering, Corfu, Greece.
19.
Marchetti S., 1980, In situ tests by flat dilatometer, Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, 106, GT3, 299-321.
20.
Mayne P.W., 2007, NCHRP Synthesis 368: Cone Penetration Test, Transportation Research Board, National Academies Press, Washington DC, 118. www.trb.org.
21.
Meyer M.E., Tan C.K., Drumheller L.C., 2001, Liquefaction mitigation at JFK Airport using dynamic compaction, [In:] Foundations and Ground Improvement, Geotechnical Special Publication, 113, 685-700.
22.
Moravej M., Vafaei M., 2019, Seismic performance evaluation of an ATC tower through pushover analysis, Structural Engineering International, 29, 144-149, DOI: 10.1080/10168664.2018.1468229.
23.
Nisqually Earthquake Clearinghouse Group, 2001, The Nisqually Earthquake of 28 Febbuary 2001, Preliminary Reconnaissance Report, University of Washington, WA (USA).
24.
NTC, 2018, Italian Building Code (in Italian), Decreto Ministeriale, G.U. n. 42 20/02/2018.
25.
Paolucci R., Mazzieri I., Smerzini C., Stupazzini M., 2014. Physics-based earthquake ground shaking scenarios in large urban areas, [In:] Perspectives on European Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, 331-359, Springer, Cham.
26.
Robertson P.K., 2016, CPT-based soil behaviour type (SBT) classification system – an update, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 53, 12, DOI: 10.1139/cgj-2016-0044.
27.
Rota M., Lai C., Strobbia C., 2011, Stochastic 1D site response analysis at a site in central Italy, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 31, 4, 626-639, DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2010.11.009.
28.
Rota M., Zuccolo E., Taverna L., Corigliano M., Lai C.G., Penna A., 2012, Mesozonation of Italian territory for definition of compatible accelerograms, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 10, 1357-1375, DOI: 10.1007/s10518-012-9369-4.
29.
Schnabel P.B., Lysmer J., Seed, H.B., 1972, Shake: A Computer Program for Earthquake Response Analysis of Horizontally Layered Sites, Report No. UCB/EERC-72/12, University of California.
30.
Spallarossa D., Barani S., 2007, Disaggregazione della pericolosit´a sismica in termini di M-R-", DPC-INGV S1 Project: http://esse1.mi.ingv.it/d14.ht....
31.
Stucchi M., Meletti C., Montaldo V. Crowley H., Calvi G.M., Boschi E., 2011, Seismic hazard assessment (2003-2009) for the Italian building code, Bulletin of Seismological Society of America, 101, 4, 1885-1911, DOI: 10.1785/0120100130.
32.
Tarque N., Lai C.G., Bozzoni F., Miccadei E., Piacentini T., Camata G., Spacone E., 2013, Expected ground motion at the historical site of Poggio Picenze, Central Italy, with reference to current Italian Building Code, Engineering Geology, 166, 8, 100-115, DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2013.09.003.
33.
Vafaei M., Alih S.C., 2018, Seismic vulnerability of air traffic control towers, Natural Hazards, 90, 803-822, DOI: 10.1007/s11069-017-3072-3.
34.
Wilcoski J., Heymsfield E., 2002, Performance and rehabilitation of type L FAA airport traffic control tower at San Carlos, California, for seismic loading, Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 16, 2, 85-93, DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0887-3828(2002)16:2(85).
35.
Zembaty Z., Kokot S., Bozzoni F., Scandella L., Lai C.G., Kuś J., Bobra P., 2015, A system to mitigate deep mine tremor effects in the design of civil infrastructure, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 1, 74, 81-90, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2015.01.004.
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.