ARTICLE
Motion planning for task-based motions of mechanical systems based on computationally generated reference dynamics
 
More details
Hide details
 
Submission date: 2024-01-03
 
 
Final revision date: 2024-02-16
 
 
Acceptance date: 2024-02-21
 
 
Online publication date: 2024-09-04
 
 
Corresponding author
Elżbieta Jarzębowska   

Power and Aeronautical Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, Nowowiejska 24,, 00-665, Warszawa, Poland
 
 
Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics 2024;62(3):615-629
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
The paper presents a development of a complementary motion planning strategy for task- -based motions for mechanicl systems. The key component of the strategy is a computational procedure for generation of constrained dynamical models, where constraints can be mate- rial or task-based ones and specify work regime requirements. The procedure provides the constrained dynamics, i.e. reference dynamics, whose solutions satisfy all constraints upon systems and enable motion planning. It is a unified tool for constrained motion analysis, mo- tion planning and controller designs. The procedure effectiveness is demonstrated through constrained dynamics generation and motion planning analysis for a robotic system.
 
REFERENCES (25)
1.
Armstrong-Hlouvry B., 1991, Control of Machines with Friction, Springer International Series in Engineering and Computer Science, New York.
 
2.
Banaszuk A., Mehta P.G, Hagen G., 2007, The role of control in design: From fixing problems to the design of dynamics, Control Engineering Practice, 15, 10, 1292-1305.
 
3.
Bounini F., Gingras D., Pollart H., Gruyer D., 2017, Modified artificial potential field method for online path planning applications, IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), LA, CA, USA.
 
4.
Chiang H.-T., Malone N., Lesser K., Oishi M., Tapia L., 2015, Path-guided artificial potential fields with stochastic reachable sets for motion planning in highly dynamic environments, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Washington, USA.
 
5.
Dixon W.E., Behal A., Dawson D.M., Nagarkatti S.P., 2003, Nonlinear Control of Engineering Systems: A Lyapunov-Based Approach, Springer.
 
6.
Do T.-T., Vu V.-H., Liu Z., 2021, Symbolic differentiation algorithm for inverse dynamics of serial robots with flexible joints, ASME Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics, 13, 6.
 
7.
Feyzabadi S., Carpin S., 2016, Multi-objective planning with multiple high level task specifications, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Stockholm, Sweden.
 
8.
Huang Y., van Gelder J.M.,Wen Y., 2018, Velocity obstacle algorithms for collision prevention at sea, Ocean Engineering, 151, 308-321.
 
9.
Jarzebowska E., 2008, Advanced programmed motion tracking control of nonholonomic mechanical systems, IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 24, 6, 1315-1328.
 
10.
Jarzębowska E., 2009, Quasi-coordinates based dynamics modeling and control design for nonholonomic systems, Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods and Applications, 71, 12, 118-131.
 
11.
Jarzębowska E., 2012, Model-Based Tracking Control of Nonlinear Systems, Boca Raton: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group.
 
12.
Jarzębowska E., Augustynek K., Urbaś A., 2018a. Automated generation of reference dynamical models for constrained robotic systems in the presence of friction and damping effects, Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 4452.
 
13.
Jarzębowska E., Augustynek K., Urbaś A., 2018b, Development of a computational based reference dynamics model of a flexible link manipulator, Springer Proceedings Mathematics and Statistics Series, Dynamical Systems in Applications, 249, 169-180.
 
14.
Jarzębowska E., Augustynek K., Urbaś A., 2023, Dynamics modeling method dedicated to system models with open- and closed-loop structures subjected to kinematic and task based constraints, Nonlinear Dynamics, 111, 13, 12053-12080.
 
15.
Jarzębowska E., Cichowski M., 2018, Dynamics modeling and performance analysis of underwater vehicles based on the Boltzmann-Hamel equations approach, MATEC Web of Conferences, 148, 03005.
 
16.
Kane T.R., Levinson D.L., 1983, The use of Kane’s dynamical equations in robotics, International Journal of Robotics Research, 2, 3, 3-21.
 
17.
Khalil W., Boyer F., Morsli F., 2017, General dynamic algorithm for floating base tree structure robots with flexible joints and links, ASME Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics, 9, 3.
 
18.
LaValle S., 2006, Planning Algorithms, Cambridge University, Cambridge.
 
19.
Lee B.H., Jeon J.D., Oh J.H., 2017, Velocity obstacle based local collision avoidance for a holonomic elliptic robot, Autonomous Robots, 41, 6, 1347-1363.
 
20.
Liu J., Liu R., 2016, Simple method to the dynamic modeling of industrial robot subject to constraint, Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 8, 4, 1-9.
 
21.
Lu Y., Xi Z., Lien J.-M., 2016, Online collision prediction among 2D polygonal and articulated obstacles, The International Journal of Robotics Research, 35, 5, 476-500.
 
22.
Macfarlane S., Croft E.A., 2003, Jerk bounded manipulator trajectory planning: Design for real-time applications, IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 19, 1, 42-52.
 
23.
Sayers M.W., 1990, Symbolic computer methods to automatically formulate vehicle simulation codes, Ph.D. Thesis, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan.
 
24.
Van den Berg J., Overmars M., 2008, Planning time-minimal safe paths amidst unpredictably moving obstacles, International Journal of Robotics Research, 27, 11-12, 1274-1294.
 
25.
Yang X., Zhang X., Xu S., Ding Y., Zhu K., Liu X., 2019, An approach to the dynamics and control of uncertain robot manipulators, Algorithms, 12, 3.
 
eISSN:2543-6309
ISSN:1429-2955
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top