ARTICLE
Predicting the trajectory of a spinning ping pong ball during flight using three-dimensional coordinates
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Nanjing Forestry University, Department of Physical Education, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
 
 
Submission date: 2023-08-17
 
 
Final revision date: 2023-12-20
 
 
Acceptance date: 2024-01-03
 
 
Online publication date: 2024-07-28
 
 
Publication date: 2024-07-31
 
 
Corresponding author
Xinyue Li   

Department of Physical Education, Nanjing Forestry University, China
 
 
Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics 2024;62(3):561-571
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Predicting the trajectory of a spinning ping pong ball can improve the effectiveness of a ping pong robot in daily training. In this study, the Vicon system was used to capture three-dimensional coordinates of the spinning ping pong ball during flight. Then, a long short-term memory (LSTM) neural network algorithm was improved by combining an adap- tive particle swarm optimization (APSO) algorithm and the attention mechanism, and the APSO-LSTM-attention method was obtained for predicting the trajectory of the spinning ping pong ball. It was found through experiments that the APSO-LSTM-attention method had average displacement errors of 6.01mm, 11.26mm, and 8.97mm in the X, Y and Z axes, respectively, and the final point displacement errors were 15.64mm, 17.93mm, and 11.26mm, respectively, indicating that the method outperformed methods such as recurrent neural networks. The time required to predict the complete trajectory by the APSO-LSTM- -attention method was also short, only 0.0186 s. The results demonstrate reliability of the proposed method in predicting the trajectory of the spinning ping pong ball and its potential application in practical scenarios.
REFERENCES (22)
1.
Amiri A., Salmasnia A., Zarifi M., Maleki M.R., 2023, Adaptive Shewhart control charts under fuzzy parameters with tuned particle swarm optimization algorithm, Journal of Industrial Integration and Management, 8, 2, 241-276.
 
2.
Amirloo E., Rasouli A., Lakner P., Rohani M., Luo J., 2022, Latent Former: Multi-Agent Transformer-Based Interaction Modeling and Trajectory Prediction, arXiv e-prints.
 
3.
Bertugli A., Calderara S., Coscia P., Ballan L., Cucchiara R., 2021, AC-VRNN: Attentive Conditional-VRNN for multi-future trajectory prediction, Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 210, 5, 1-10.
 
4.
Bidyanath K., Singh S.D., Adhikari S., 2023, Implementation of genetic and particle swarm optimization algorithm for voltage profile improvement and loss reduction using capacitors in 132 kV Manipur transmission system, Energy Reports, 9, 738-746.
 
5.
Chen K., Song X., Ren X., 2021, Modeling social interaction and intention for pedestrian trajectory prediction, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 570, 9, 1-12.
 
6.
Chen X., Meng X., Zhao Y., 2020, Genetic algorithm to improve Back Propagation Neural Network ship track prediction, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1650, 3, 1-9.
 
7.
Goldfarb N., Lewis A., Tacescu A., Fischer G.S., 2021, Open source Vicon Toolkit for motion capture and gait analysis, Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 212, 106414.
 
8.
Gomez-Gonzalez S., Nemmour Y., Schölkopf B., Peters J., 2019, Reliable real time ball tracking for robot table tennis, Robotics, 8, 4, 1-13.
 
9.
Gruet M.A., Chandorkar M., Sicard A., Camporeale E., 2018, Multiple-hour-ahead forecast of the DST index using a combination of long short-term memory neural network and Gaussian process, Space Weather, 16, 11, 1882-1896.
 
10.
Hauri S., Djuric N., Radosavljevic V., Vucetic S., 2021, Multi-modal trajectory prediction of NBA players, Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision, 1639-1648.
 
11.
Huang M., Ochieng W.Y., Escribano Macias J.J., Ding Y., 2021, Accuracy evaluation of a new generic Trajectory Prediction model for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, Aerospace Science and Technology, 19, Dec. Pt. 2, 1-26.
 
12.
Inoue M., Inoue S., Nishida T., 2018, Deep recurrent neural network for mobile human activity recognition with high throughput, Artificial Life and Robotics, 23, 2, 173-185.
 
13.
Kalatian A., Farooq B., 2022, A context-aware pedestrian trajectory prediction framework for automated vehicles, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 134, 103453.
 
14.
Kumar K.S., Gomathi B.R., 2022, Forecasting photovoltaic power output using long short-term memory and neural network models, International Journal on Engineering Applications, 10, 2, 116-125.
 
15.
Li S., Wang S., Xie D., 2019, Radar track prediction method based on BP neural network, The Journal of Engineering, 21, 8051-8055.
 
16.
Mir M., 2018, Cruise Missile Target Trajectory Movement Prediction Based on Optimal 3D Kalman Filter with Firefly Algorithm, arXiv:1807.07006.
 
17.
Mirmohammad Y., Khorsandi S., Shahsavari M.N., Yazdankhoo B., Sadeghnejad S., 2021, Ball trajectory prediction for humanoid robots: combination of k-NN regression and autoregression methods, International RoboCup Symposium, 1-12.
 
18.
Rajini Selvaraj A., Gurusamy, T., 2023, An optimal model using single-dimensional CAE-IRNN based SPOA for cyclone track prediction, Expert Systems with Application, 230, 1-13.
 
19.
Rodrigues T.B., Cathin C.Ó., Devine D., Moran K., O’Connor N.E., Murray N., 2019, An evaluation of a 3D multimodal marker-less motion analysis system, The 10th ACM Multimedia Systems Conference, 213-221.
 
20.
Song T., Li Y., Meng F., Xie P., Xu D., 2022, A novel deep learning model by BiGRU with attention mechanism for tropical cyclone track prediction in the Northwest Pacific, Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 61, 1, 3-12.
 
21.
Xi Z., Xu A., Kou Y., Li Z., Yang A., 2021, Target maneuver trajectory prediction based on RBF neural network optimized by hybrid algorithm, Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 32, 2, 498-516.
 
22.
Zheng J., Cai F., Shao T., Chen H., 2018, Self-interaction attention mechanism-based text representation for document classification, Applied Sciences, 8, 4, 1-14.
 
eISSN:2543-6309
ISSN:1429-2955
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top