ARTICLE
The influence of loading rate on the mechanical behavior and energy evolution characteristics of hard and soft rock under triaxial compression
More details
Hide details
1
China Coal Technology and Engineering Chongqing Design and Research Institute (Group) Co., Ltd., Chongqing, China
2
School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China
Submission date: 2022-04-21
Final revision date: 2022-05-26
Acceptance date: 2022-06-12
Online publication date: 2022-07-12
Publication date: 2022-07-30
Corresponding author
Chao Chen
Geotechnical Structure Safety Design Department, China Coal Technology & Engineering Chongqing Design & Research Institute (Group) Co., Ltd., China
Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics 2022;60(3):495-508
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
To investigate the influence of loading rate and confining pressure on the mechanical behavior
and energy evolution characteristics of hard and soft rock, high strength sandstone and low
strength granite were subjected to triaxial compression tests with different loading rates.
The results show that significant differences exist in the stress-strain curves for sandstone
and granite. The confining pressure has a significant effect on the stress-strain curve, while
the loading rate has a smaller effect on the stress-strain curve. As the confining pressure
increases, the peak axial strain, peak axial stress, total energy, elastic energy and dissipated
energy of sandstone and granite increase, the proportion of dissipated energy to total energy
of sandstone and the proportion of elastic energy to total energy of granite are reduced. As
the loading rate goes up, the peak axial stress, total energy and elastic energy increase in
both sandstone and granite. The ultimate failure pattern of sandstone is a typical single
inclined plane shear failure, while the ultimate failure pattern of granite consists of a single
inclined plane shear failure and a vertical split failure. The loading rate has no significant
effect on the macroscopic failure pattern, the elastic and dissipated energies are proportional
to the total energy of sandstone and granite.
REFERENCES (20)
1.
Alam A.K.M.B., Fujii Y., Fukuda D., Kodama J., Kaneko K., 2015, Fractured rock permeability as a function of temperature and confining pressure, Pure and Applied Geophysics, 172, 2871-2889.
2.
Asem P., 2019, Base resistance of drilled shafts in soft rock using in situ load tests: A limit state approach, Soils and Foundations, 59, 6, 1639-1658.
3.
Chen Z.Q., He C., Hu X.Y., Ma C.C., 2021, Effect of stress paths on failure mechanism and progressive damage of hard-brittle rock, Journal of Mountain Science, 18, 2486-2502.
4.
Cui Z, Qian S, Zhang G.M., Maochu Z., 2021, An experimental investigation of the influence of loading rate on rock tensile strength and split fracture surface morphology, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 54, 1969-1983.
5.
Fairhurst C.E., Hudson J.A., 1999, Draft ISRM suggested method for the complete stress-strain curve for the intact rock in uniaxial compression, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 36, 3, 279-289.
6.
Fereidooni D., Khanlari G., Heidari M., Sepahigero A.A., Kolahi-Azar A.P., 2016, Assessment of inherent anisotropy and confining pressure influences on mechanical behavior of anisotropic foliated rocks under triaxial compression, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 49, 2155-2163.
7.
Gao M.Z., Zhang J.G., Li S.W., Wang M., Wang Y.W., Cui P.F., 2020, Calculating changes in fractal dimension of surface cracks to quantify how the dynamic loading rate affects rock failure in deep mining, Journal of Central South University, 27, 3013-3024.
8.
Hu B., Yang S.Q., Xu P., Cheng J.L., 2019, Cyclic loading-unloading creep behavior of composite layered specimens, Acta Geophysica, 67, 449-464.
9.
Huang D., Li Y.R., 2014, Conversion of strain energy in triaxial unloading tests on marble, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 66, 160-168.
10.
Huang D., Liu Y., Yang Y.Y., Li Z., Meng Q., 2021, Experimental study on three-point-bending characteristics of hard and soft rock-like materials under different loading rates, Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 14, 1951.
11.
Karami M., Tolooiyan A., 2020, Investigating the elastoplasticity of an Australian soft rock based on laboratory test results, Engineering Geology, 276, 105762.
12.
Kavvadas M., Roumpos C., Schilizzi P., 2020, Stability of deep excavation slopes in continuous surface lignite mining systems, Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 38, 791-812.
13.
Lamas L., 2017, International Society for Rock Mechanics – ISRM, [In:] Encyclopedia of Engineering Geology, P. Bobrowsky, B. Marker (Edit.), Encyclopedia of Earth Sciences Series, Springer, Cham.
14.
Majedi M.R., Afrazi M., Fakhimi A., 2021, A micromechanical model for simulation of rock failure under high strain rate loading, International Journal of Civil Engineering, 19, 501-515.
15.
Munoz H., Taheri A., Chanda E.K., 2016, Rock drilling performance evaluation by an energy dissipation based rock brittleness index, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 49, 3343-3355.
16.
Pinazzi P.C., Spearing A.J.S., Jessu K.V., Singh P., Hawker R., 2021, Combined load failure criterion for rock bolts in hard rock mines, Mining Metallurgy and Exploration, 38, 427-432.
17.
Sengani F., 2020, Characterisation of rock fracturing ahead of the preconditioned mining faces in a hard rock mining, Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 13, 670.
18.
Wang X.R., Wang E.Y., Liu X.F., Zhou X., 2021, Failure mechanism of fractured rock and associated acoustic behaviors under different loading rates, Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 247, 107674.
19.
Wisetsaen S., Walsri C., Fuenkajorn K., 2015, Effects of loading rate and temperature on tensile strength and deformation of rock salt, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 73, 10-14.
20.
Xiong L.X., Chen H.J., 2020, Effects of high temperatures and loading rates on the splitting tensile strength of jointed rock mass, Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 38, 1885-1898.